The actions taken by the Revenue Authorities in connection with Section V / A, R 11 and Section 9 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 exemption / division were dismissed by the plaintiff's scope for dismissal to the plaintiff. With respect to the distribution and order of suit property approved by the learned plaintiff, the treatment of the appeal had already been obtained before the taxation classification was considered as a court of final jurisdiction and regardless of Can also decide on the accuracy of the order approved by the revenue authorities. Availability of Appeal or Revision Treatment before the High Forum but when an individual has taken advantage of the Appeal / Revision Treatment as per law, then it is not allowed to simultaneously apply the Civil Court jurisdiction against the same order. Can go The defendant was a co-participant in the suit property and was not eligible to file a civil court order declaring in favor of the plaintiff that he was the exclusive owner of the property until and unless the property was officially divided at each The participant was considered to be the owner of every inch of the land, the wrong orders not approved by the miscellaneous evidence or the non-reading of evidence were dismissed in the lower courts under review and the Deputy District Officer's Revenue Was directed to decide the matter within a period of three months.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
