The second appeal against Sections 10, 13 and 15 was that the tenant allowed the payment of the rent and the landlord's application as per the landlord's personal requirement. The first appeal filed by the tenant was allowed by the appellate court, demanding the section on harmony, the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 10 of 1959, the first appellate court granted the right to ease It was found that there was no more relationship between landlord and tenant and that the tenant was on the other's rent. Under the provisions of section 10 of the Act, the non-presentation of the landlord was applicable by both courts in the case where the relationship of landlord and tenant existed when the dismissal order was approved by the rent controller. , Which was upheld by the lower appellate court. There were no longer tenants under the landlord, but at present they were tenants in the premises under which the landlord's share was not in the tenancy of the landlord, when the landlord passed the tenants. Section 10 could not be applied in the case of a landlord, who had the simple right to go in the absence of a landlord's relationship and the tenant was allowed to appeal to the landlord.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
