Claims for specific performance of the Articles 12 and 22 Agreement were filed by both the plaintiff and the defendants for the specific performance of the contract for the same land, and the trial court dismissed the plaintiff's case and defendant's claim The impression was rejected that he was entitled to receive. It was not possible to double the amount as a specific performance of the sale agreement, however, the appellate court ruled that the plaintiffs' lawsuit was absolute after the landowners acknowledged the agreement to sell and sell. Became the owner. The sale deed was executed by all the owners in favor of the plaintiff, and they also admitted that the defendants had failed to produce any evidence that the plaintiff's property owners did not sell in favor of the sale agreement. ? It was allegedly executed in favor of the defendants, which was not signed by the two minor witnesses of the agreement. Only one sale was made in court in which the sale agreement was not proved in favor of the defendants. The suit occupied the land and the sale agreement was not enforceable in favor of the defendants and it was entitled to double the amount paid. Land trial court owners exercised discretion with fairness and imposed judgment and decree passed by the appellate court were set aside and restored to those who were in the trial court. The second was accepted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
