Find a Lawyer

UMAR HAYAT versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR

Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for the removal of a tenant dispute relating to the title of property controller; Only this can be solved. The request for a civil court withdrawal was simultaneously accepted on the part of the parties whose legal title was related to the record. No rent was received to get the contract of. In order to move into the question of title to the property, the rent controller can assume jurisdiction only in cases where the tenancy was recognized. Went to the legal authority without any legal effect which had no legal effect. The constitutional request was accepted in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. MUHAMMAD SADIQUE 2014 YLR 2407
• IBRAHEEM v. State 2014 YLR 2421
• MUHAMMAD JAVAID IQBAL v. STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN through Governor 2014 YLR 2450
• LIAQAT ALI KHAN v. AHMED HASSAN SIDDIQUI 2014 YLR 2468
• Malik GULZAR MEHMOOD v. MUHAMMAD SALEEM FARUKH 2014 YLR 2506
• LIAQUAT ALI v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, LAYYAH 2014 YLR 2527
• ATIF ALI v. SPECIAL JUDGE OF ATC-IV, LAHORE 2014 YLR 2534
• ASHIQ HUSSAIN v. State 2014 YLR 2554

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

top civil advocates from Patika lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes