Sections 302, 460, 147, 148, 149 and 34 Qatim Um, the complainant is accused of defaming the house by night or by breaking into a house, creating confusion, unlawful assembly and complimentary evidence. After cutting the wall, the accused started firing and the trial court convicted the accused under Section 460, PPC and acquitted them on other charges, alleging that the FIR was lodged after 11 hours delay. Was gone, the shooting had no role. There was no injury to the subpoena and section 460, evidence of PPC prosecution was not obtained, legal evidence was not available at the time of the medical examination, neither the accused were named nor the incident occurred. Was revealed about. The manner in which the prosecutor alleged and did not reveal his own injuries caused by the alleged accused was reported to have been vacant from the scene, the Commission on Identifiable Crime Despite having information about, no FIR was filed, the complainant failed to explain the delay of eleven hours in filing the FIR, considering the delay of eleven hours in the FIR registration The prosecution's witnesses were not able to provide sufficient time for the failure of the hearing and counseling because they were either located or were upstairs. I was not involved and had failed to disclose the incident. These important witnesses were asked to find out whether the evacuees were recovered from the scene of the incident, or that the investigating officer did not appear as a witness to investigate.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
