In section 302 (b) the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2002), Pres. Qutel appreciated the evidence, confirming the unnatural cause of death of the deceased on the chest when the complainant during his examination The contents of the IR were accurately described and they remained stable The defense failed to interrupt the complainant's statement during the cross examination, according to the statements of the eyewitnesses of the incident. The complainant's defense failed to record any unlawful will or libel on the part of the eyewitnesses or failed to disclose his relationship with the complainant as the witness's statement was rejected as an independent witness. It fully supports the prosecution's story. Eyewitnesses were confident that Indy also accurately described the details of the incident; the defense failed to identify instability or contrary motives against eyewitnesses about the disclosure memo of falsifying the witnesses. This led to the discovery of new facts which were not previously known and which were also credible and further strengthened the prosecution case. Prosecutors revealed success by demonstrating the conduct of the parties due to business enmity, evidence of three witnesses, medical evidence as well as evidence of circumstances, disclosure of the accused, empty pistol crime and handing over to the recovered police. Has proved beyond any doubt that the killing of the deceased on account of business enmity was made by the accused, the evidence of the prosecution was trustworthy and he too was not subject to any contradiction or intolerance, Section 302, pp. Total of C (B)
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
