Find a Lawyer

SOHAIL versus MST. NAZIA AMIN

Article 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Rules for Receipt of Recovery Case Scope Husband did not arrest the trial decision and order and obtained the final decision and order which was final Had reached the limit. Not to be reopened in the execution proceedings Both courts had already presented sufficient and reasonable diligence in favor of the husband, the following constitutional petition was dismissed in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015

• HAROON AHMED v. SECRETARY COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT 2015 MLD 1220
• ABDUL ALEEM v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1269
• MUHAMMAD ALI v. ABDUL JALIL 2015 CLC 1315
• NABEEL v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1364
• BANNERS STORE PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. Malik ZAFAR IQBAL 2015 YLR 1377
• DILMURAD DILJAN alias DILO v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1389
• ZULIKHA BIBI v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2015 YLR 1584
• ABDUL HAFEEZ LUNI v. The STATE through NAB 2015 YLR 1596

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2015 →

tax advocates from Samundri lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes