BANNERS STORE PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus MALIK ZAFAR IQBAL
Sections 409, 406 and 34 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) Violation of criminal trust by public servants, joint intent against evading evidence, appeal against acquittal, on two scores. There was no action. First of all, because it was filed by someone who was not able to praise the \ sad person. And secondly, the appeal was signed by the plaintiff's lawyer, while no affidavit was attached in relation to the merits of the case, not only should it be assigned under section 409, PPC, Be honest, misuse or change one's own use. Or the illegal disposal of property by the offender, but there was no evidence in this case that there was no evidence that the allegedly misappropriated money was due to work on behalf of the accused persons, or anyone else. Was stolen by people with money, and cash was not misused. There was a record to prove that the appellant sustained any damages that were allegedly incurred by the accused. Appellant also failed to establish that the money allegedly handed over to the accused, There was no misappropriation, no headline account details or details of allegedly invalid articles. The records that were necessary to substantiate the basis of these allegations are documents that were presented to the trial court as unacceptable. For example, the trial court did not have any misconception of any evidence and the law was inaccurate. Fahmy did not encounter the material available on the record as his true body
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
