Sections 302 (b), 324, 353 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Sections 407 and 410 of the Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 129, Iloos (G) and 22 Qutal Um, attempt to commit murder MMD, appellate evidence against criminal power, common intention and terrorism conviction for preventing a civil servant from performing his duties Advantage was allegedly fired at FC personnel and escaped and pursued when officers tried to enter the house where the suspects were hiding, the suspects fired once again. An officer was killed and injured in Tejay due to which the trial court sentenced one of the accused. Several charges led to the conviction and other acquittals, first when the accused party opened fire on patrol personnel and escaped, and second, when the officers tried to enter the house. And the per- sons of the accused opened fire on them, resulting in the death of an officer and two wounded FC patrols when they were first fired, but they did not retaliate and only the accused. Followed It was not natural, credible and rational to say and the trial court correctly denied the litigation story. No specific role was attributed to the accused. The incident allegedly took place on a dark night, attacking FC personnel who did not know the suspect, nor did they know. No specific role was assigned to the accused by the name, or even witnesses
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
