Sections 9 (c), 32 (2) and 48 of the drug possession and smuggling charges were seized under the custody of the car which was being used by the appellant / accused in the same case, the state. Was seized and ordered to be auctioned by the special court, which was given to the appellant in Syed Kar Superdri, but ignoring this aspect of the case. And in order to issue notice to the appellant / owner and also in violation of the inquiry process, the special court had ruled that the car confiscation was in error in the eyes of the law, and To this end, the unclean order was set aside, and the special court was remanded with the direction of the matter, first to issue a notice to the owner of the car, and then a miscellaneous inquiry, while the appellant Superior with. And then pass the order in connection with the car's disposal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
