The Appellant was sentenced to change the collection of the amount of the fine as Section 32 and 33E Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 70 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 386 Land Revenue, and ten. Sentenced to a year. RI, with a fine of Rs 50,633,833 or pay default for two-and-a-half years \ Appellant was eventually dismissed because the appellant was sent to jail on the expiry of his term. Refused to give a verdict before being released. The National Accountability Bureau imprisons the petition for recovery of fines where an offender has to go to jail instead of paying a fine, which was a very special reason that would enable the court in its discretion, imposing a ruling on this order. Notwithstanding, the offender had served the entire prison sentence under the default order of payment of penalties for section 386, CR PC and section 70, PPC. It has been clearly stated that the amount charged in lieu of fines can be recovered as arrears of land revenue. However, Section 33E of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 was in accordance with the provisions of the CCP and the PPC was an unnecessary decision approved by the Accountability Court and did not demand any intervention by the High Court. r \ n
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
