Sections 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 34 Kutul Um, Joint Intent Guarantee, Revocation of Bail, the accused has been acquitted, by a short and spoken order, hid during the trial. And was absent from himself, and was arrested after seventeen (17) year-long trials following a fugitive order. The trial court found that in the absence of independent witnesses, post-mortem inspections and specific roles, the accused was entitled to a discount on bail. , But did not discuss the culprit's long-pending conviction in the indictment - the accused was accused of directly murdering his son, temporarily examining the case, a temporary review of the case First, the person involved was involved in the case. Arriving within the prohibited clause of section 497, the CCPC lawyer has sought counsel for the accused on the basis that on the same set of evidence, the co-accused had already been acquitted. And that there was no possibility of the accused's conviction on the same evidence, was not appropriate, because the decision of the participant's acquittal had no effect on the trial of the accused in the absence of the accused, for his conviction. It could not be used. Likewise, it also could not be used for the benefit of the accused. The accused was deliberately, guilty of long and unknown \ fugitives, and was waiting for his accomplice to acquit the accused; In the process, it will be enough to ignore it. Bail Exemption Long fugitive, in view of the conduct of the accused and the nature of the crime, the accused was not entitled to exemption in the bail cases; the trial court granted bail to the accused, hi
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
