Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 of Qatil AMD, attempt to commit murder Qadal Amjad, disturbance and joint purpose bail, further investigation against the accused were the charges. The accompanying accused committed the murder of the complainant's uncle for 11 hours and 30 minutes in filing an FIR and the complainant's counseling with his elders did not occur in the darkness of the night, nor did he report No source of light was disclosed by the complainant, nor did the complainant seize any lighting device by chance The question about the dispute was whether the accused had committed the crime or was the result of a previous rivalry / motive which was considered dual in the criminal case that the evidence of the sword was not yet to be recorded. A temporary review of the records and the circumstances showed that the possibility of throwing a wide net at it was not dismissed on the part of the complainant for the inclusion of male members of a single family who had made this allegation on the accused applicant's case. It was found that after further investigation of his crime, no sketch or sketch of the location of the crime was presented. All the people I was in were shot. There was still no determination during the trial regarding the culpability of the accused and the general object and the assignment of the fatal bullet on the victim, after the evidence was recorded and the material on record at the bail-out stage. Deep appreciation was always outdated which was to be seen in the decision to request a bailout material collected during the investigation.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
