Section 302 (b) Definition of Qatil-Umid evidence The benefit of the doubt Medical evidence of double murder showed that the injuries sustained on the two victims were of different types and were recovered on the identification of the four accused. The crime does not match the pistol. Such facts show that the double murder was not to be committed by a single person Medical Board formed during the trial that the accused was a mad person suffering from scaphone, allegedly causing the disease. That was presented under litigation. , Since the victim's brother was not presented a free person on the extension of the threats at the pistol point and there was no report that the prosecution suppressed the material facts and how the incident was concealed from mystery. In what manner, at what time, and by whom were the injured wounded and were executed, there was no evidence or incident of the prosecution's suspicion in the manner suggested by the prosecution. Failing to prove his case against the accused, the High Court increased the benefit of the doubt While he was acquitted of the offense, an appeal was allowed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
