The allegations against the High Court's jurisdiction accused in the termination of Article 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), sections 337 F (IV), 452, 148 and 149 surrounded Jifah, domestic confusion, riots and common objects. They committed it. In addition to corrupting and injuring the complainant's wife in the house, another FIR has been lodged against the allegedly intimidated complainant party in which the police station, the date and its presence are the same. The version was present and one person from each party was reportedly sustained injuries and which of the two versions was correct, this was a question that needed to be determined in the light of the evidence during the trial. Who was the assailant and who was attacked when the absence of evidence could not be answered when a crime was committed. Then, the usual trial procedure should not be overlooked that the inherent powers of the High Court can only be exercised in extraordinary cases, where no crime has been proved, even if the allegations made in the FIR are at trial. Whether it was proven or when there was no evidence, or where there was a violation of the law or where any illegal identification was made, it was a serious cause of abortion. Justice was not identified in any of the cases, which could guarantee the intervention of the High Court in exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 561 A CR PC, only for the purpose of criminal code of conduct. I had to fill in the existing negotiation, in cases where no special supplies or supplies were provided.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
