Definition of evidence of section 9 (b) drug possession The charges against the accused were that he had 950 grams of hashish. The statements of the complainant and the investigating officer did not indicate who took the detainee and the accused to the police station and the fact remains. Mystery and such mysterious arrests and drug recovery made the prosecutor's case suspicious when the investigating officer arrived at the scene to identify the suspect, and was also told why the accused and the accused. Not assigned? The silence of both key and material witnesses, along with the silence of both the principal and the material witnesses on the two important facts, led to serious suspicions that the incident did not and did not follow the prosecutor's statement. The investigation was reasonable. Suspicion in the Law section of Arts 3 and 4, the Prohibition (Enforcement) Order, 1979 t o Section 9, Narcotic Sub-Matter Act 1997 weakens the legality of the case because of the post of Sub-Inspector. The FIR, instead of the officer in charge, was arrested and then investigated by the Assistant Sub Inspector against the mandatory provisions. Under the Control of the Narcotic Sub Maintenance Act, 1997, his case was not proved beyond reasonable doubt, the appeal was accepted and the accused applicant was acquitted and convicted and acquitted of the charges.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
