Articles 4, 8, and 15 provide damages for damages to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's claim for damaging his business and reputation in three major circulation newspapers, for the purposes of recovering damages and damaging his business and reputation. In the petition filed by the trial court after Rs.1,00,000 was filed against the defendant, it was claimed that the plaintiff did not prove the service of legal notice by inspecting or appearing with the postal department officer. In the event of defamation, the Honor Failure failed to comply with the essential provisions of Section 8 of the Ordinance 2002. The facts of the receipt of the postal receipt / AD, or courier service, in the written statement and at the trial, were not denied in the trial and the allegation against the plaintiff press clippings containing defamatory statements, when the plaintiff's evidence was in evidence. When presented, it was not objected to. Although the defendant had copied evidence of such material without proving his or her genealogy, such notice may be given by any means, such as through a messenger, general post or any other possible mode. ? Such prior notice to defendant was not specifically denied by him nor did he object to his tender by the plaintiff. The defendant's statement regarding the defendant's prior notice of proceedings was not rejected. Under the law, such notice of action was given to the defendant before the present litigation, which was practically untrue, was proved. Therefore, it will not require further and formal proof. The amount of damages awarded by the trial court is a little tight
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
