Find a Lawyer

MST. PARVEEN versus BAKHSHEESH

Two of the three accused were acquitted during the trial in section 337F (v) Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), section 417 (2A) appealed against the dismissal of Hashima's plea. , While the third was fined. An unexpected delay of ten thousand rupees did not yield anything in the delay report for six hours. The appellate court had identified the contradictions and contradictions in the statement of the prosecution witnesses and did not give detailed reasons for the prosecution's prosecution. There were. Appeal dismissed against any illegal, irresponsible identification and misreading of reading and appellate court evidence

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• AMANULLAH KHAN v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2014 CLD 1181
• Haji MUHAMMAD ADEEL v. CANTONMENT BOARD, PESHAWAR through the Cantonment Executive Officer, Peshawar Cantt. 2014 MLD 1186
• Mst. SHAH ROOM v. Mst. KHAISTA BIBI 2014 YLR 1193
• SAID RASOOL v. Dr. HAMAYUN KHAN 2014 MLD 1199
• NISAR MUHAMMAD KHAN v. SAEEDULLAH KHAN 2014 YLR 1218
• UNITED RUBBER (PVT.) LIMITED v. BANK OF KHYBER, (BOK) 2014 CLD 1220
• UMAR DARAZ v. State 2014 YLR 1231
• Mian MUSTAFA GUL v. PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR 2014 PLC(CS) 1234

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

divorce advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes