A. VIII, R11, Section 12 (2) and 11 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), for the declaration of section 42 suit, such right cannot be defeated by any degree and doubt. Had to be removed. In their favor, the previous order was passed against which under section 12 (2), the application was rejected by the CPC while the defendants had made the request under section 12 (2). Did not file a request through them. The trial court, however, confirmed the dismissal by the appellate court, and the parties were brothers and sisters and they were entitled to their predecessor's legacy. The result of this was to gain share. Plaintiffs' Hearing and Fake Request Under Section 12 (2), the CPC was filed by a lawyer with the ulterior motive of consolidating the collective decree, which was the son of the plaintiff's trial court. The ND considered the factual facts of the previous case against which the application was submitted, the right of inheritance shall not be defeated by the law of the law or the judiciary nor any law or decision can be subjected to Shariah law Source to dismiss it. The trial court was in consequence of a misinterpretation of the law and required evidence to resolve the dispute. The appellate court was allowed to set aside the trial court's decision and according to the law, the case was reversed. The remand was obtained in circumstances where the review was excluded
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
