Section 561A and 154 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 365A abduction or confiscation of property, valuable security, etc. Section 561A, CR PC Scope Petition for Termination of FIR, in its hereditary jurisdiction, the High Court was charged with terminating the FIR, dismissing the accused and his accomplices. He had kidnapped the kidnapper for ransom and alleged that he was innocent and involved in the FIR due to the complainant's personal motives and personal grudges. The current FIR is an abuse of court process. The disappearance of the abductor was reported to the police without any delay by the complainant, after which the abductor reached his house and recorded a statement before the magistrate under Section 164, CR PC. , In which he, along with fellow accused, charged them with ransom for ransom, also stated before the magistrate that his brother / complainant had also paid the ransom, similarly before the magistrate playwright. The statement was presented by the accused, who supported his arrest. The FIR, currently exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 1 561A, CRPC, could not be viewed by the High Court, on the one hand with the abductor and the complainant's statements before the magistrate. A timely FIR was lodged, in which the accused was charged. This offense, while on the other hand, the accused had claimed baldness while pleading for his innocence, hence the decision of the High Court under Section 561A, CRPC, requested by the jurist
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
