Articles 302 (b), 324 and 34 Qatil Adm, an attempt to commit the murder, the joint intention became an interesting witness driver's pick-up, which was the only free-eyed witness to the incident and could provide an accurate and accurate version of the incident. Was. The fact that the incident did not occur was presented by the prosecution, saying the non-presentation of the witness would have led to the assumption that when it was presented, he would have told the truth which would not be agreed with the prosecution. The person who claimed to have witnessed the incident was not only a relative of the deceased party, but also expressed a three-hour delay in filing a report by the complainant at the hospital against the accused party. The presence was made suspicious, when the dead body was brought to the hospital by the local police, it would be that after consideration and consultation, an FIR was lodged, which lasted 4 to 8 hours between the victim's death. The delay and the post mortem of her deceased were not equal. The manner and manner in which the complainant has been charged. And when such a story surfaced in the realm of record, it was incredible that such suspicion would go to the accused persons, in this case allegations of motivation could be the reason for the false execution of the accused, Because the prosecution had failed to prove the case against the accused. And the complaining party had a reason to make false accusations. The investigating officer seized on the spot 7 62 bore guns, never sent the specialist to ascertain whether the men were fired on multiple firearms. Trial Court charged with trial
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
