Attempts to commit Section 417 (2A) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 34 of Qutal-Umd, after the trial, the joint intention appeal against the evil complainant stated in the FIR that Kalashnikov The two co-accused entered the store, opened fire on their son, and his son went inside the store to buy some goods, while he (the complainant) remained outside the shop when the prosecution appeared as a witness. He had denied the FIR statements, three of the accused, including the main accused, who had 7 bore-loaded rifles, also sued his deceased son, the complainant. The color in which it was said that he and his son had gone to the store and confessed to the complaint that he had not seen the accused. At the time of the shooting and the injured complainant was unable to say how many shots were shot by each of the shopkeepers whose shop was located and alleged witnesses were not inspected, according to prosecutorial statements by the complainant and The statements of the injured prosecution witnesses contradicted each other, in contrast to the complainant's initial report, the injured witnesses told a completely different story to the accountant presented by the complainant. The prosecution has shown the injured as eyewitnesses, because of the injuries sustained during the incident, they will not get enough evidence that they have talked about the entire site plan, the complainant and two witnesses. Was created on the indication that he did not examine the prosecution's points shown in the witness site plan, the prosecution's witnesses said.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
