By issuing a check to terminate the FIR by the High Court in its inherent authority under Section 561A & 154 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 481F dishonestly in section 561A, the PC scope complaint The complainant alleged that he had paid cash to the accused / applicant. As a loan, and in return the defendant gave a check to repay the loan, however, said that the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds. It was alleged that he had already paid cash to the complainant through a confession, so the complainant was obliged to return the check, instead of involving him in a false case, the police were charged against the accused under Section 489F. The IRC filed, the PPC's accuracy, the defendant did not refuse to hand over the complaint to the complainant, and thus the investigating agency had collected enough material to prove the offense under section 498. The FPPC alleged that it had already repaid the loan to the complainant in cash, while the accused could not be given weight in the absence of evidence, which was still pending by the trial court. Did not receive anything to establish the record that he had attempted to return the check to the complainant or that he had approached the concerned bank before submitting the check prima facie that the complainant could not be contacted directly. In light of the charges, there is a case against the accused. When an initial offense was committed with the help of material collected during the investigation, the trial was not generally ignored.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
