SYED MEHBOOB SHAH versus DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE AND ESTATE/COLLECTOR HARIPUR
Section Civil Civilced Code of Civil Procedure (V 190ced of V), sections ief Special Relief Act (I of 1877), sections 42 and 54, which declare and permit permanent injunction on the proposed acquisition of their land for the defendant It is alleged that it is not for public purpose, therefore, to prevent the petitioner from issuing a notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and to issue a road construction on the suit land by the authority. During the trial, the trial is to be dismissed under O VII, R 11, CPC. Jurisdiction is available through the Appellate Court. The property landlord, if the government agrees to the acquisition of his land due to fiduciary duties or illegal proceedings, and also before the issuance of such notification, the various remedies provided by the Land Acquisition Act 1894 In this case, the discharge from the jurisdiction of the civil court must either be expressly provided for in the clear or clear terms of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Prior to the issuance of such a notification under the Civil Court's jurisdiction to dismiss the complaint, High Court pointed out that the land acquired by land through the TV and the challenge was made to separate the illegal decisions / orders and remand the case. The court will decide whether the suit land was acquired for public purpose and whether it was actually used for the public purpose and whether the plaintiff requested the provisions of the Acquisition Act 1894 It may have increased land compensation,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
