Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Regulation (XLV of 1860), Sections 365B, 376 and 34, abduction, forcing a woman to abduct or marry, etc., rape, joint intention with her husband during the marriage complaint Complainant with her husband was proved on record. The accused did not accuse the complainant / kidnapper of any incompetence in obtaining bail before the arrest nor did he mention why he was involved. In this case the complainant / abductor in his statement gave details of the incident and the accused was fully involved in the crime, which was not denied but the second marriage was requested (by the accused). The accused had to stay within the trial (Prohibition). According to the provisions of section 497, the PC accused had committed a hate crime of moral misconduct, which was also against the integration of Islam and in any case he was already abnormally privileged. Was not entitled. Restlessness Guarantees The pre-arrest bail of the accused has been withdrawn
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
