Find a Lawyer

HAJI MIAN KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHUTNKHWA

The scope of reviewing Section 114 and AXLVII, R1, was that huge investment was made in the land leased by them but no research was done on the same accuracy and no clear or The important thing was not neglected. No legal error or law error or wrong theoretical decision was indicated to appear at the level of any subsequent discovery of certain documents cannot be the basis for reviewing any decision by terminating all remedies provided in the courts. Consider the review, which was filed with a purpose and object to highlight the decision, which was reviewed in which the removal request in the judgment had no direct effect. There was no room for review as it could have flaws. The next high forum applicant did not have a case for review on an unhelpful decision. The review request was dismissed.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Haji ZERI GUL v. AHMAD JAN KHAN 2014 PCrLJ 1361
• Syed MEHBOOB SHAH v. DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE AND ESTATE/COLLECTOR HARIPUR 2014 YLR 1366
• Mst. SHER BANU v. Syed AMEER HUSSAIN SHAH 2014 MLD 1368
• Mst. ZAKIA BEGUM v. Mian ABDULLAH SHAH 2014 YLR 1378
• NAJAM IQBAL v. Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR 2014 YLR 1388
• IQBAL ZADA v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1397
• SHAHBAZ GUL SHINWARI v. FAQIR HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 1404
• Mst. SHAHIDA v. NADRA through Director National Database 2014 MLD 1411

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Ghari Dupatta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes