In respect of the question regarding the exemption denied, the first party established the fact that the accused had committed the offense under Section 489F, PPC dispute. What has aggravated the matter? The complainant was of a civil nature, had no power, because there was no material in the file that could suggest and indicate that the case was outside the scope of Section 489F, PPC and it was subject to Section 489F, P. The PC was a civil offense. The sentence could have been punishable by a maximum of three years, and it did not fall under the section 497 restriction clause. In the present case, the PC High Court refused the bail of the accused, as the accused had violated his pledge. Did not admit, complained to the complainant to pay the question to the court and the accused cheated the court by issuing a check to the complainant, knowing full well that the money in question was not in his account o The F-accused was sufficient to bring his case within an exception even though the accused's case was not covered by the section 497, CR PC ban, but Mills Conduct dishonored the commitment made before the court. On the strength of the check before the arrest, his bail was confirmed before the arrest, which was later disgraced, in which case, there was no right to be released on bail, the request for bail was dismissed. I
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
