Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS versus LUCKY CEMENT LTD.

Section 196 restriction Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 banned from delaying the reference of the High Court time, to the issue of jurisdiction The jurisdiction cannot be treated differently from the ordinary litigation where the Government has in its discretion Despite the tremendous resources and facilities it continues. Delays in timely litigation, harmful to their own interests, can not be punished for such negligence. Each limitation should be satisfactorily specified by which applicant of the Customs of Collectors. Failed to perform source reference filed / hopefully withheld over time. And the reasons provided for the late condolences were not accepted, the reference was not provided by the High Court.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Syed IQBAL HUSSAIN SHAH v. Mst. KALSOOM BIBI 2014 YLR 359
• QISMATULLAH v. State 2014 YLR 372
• MUHAMMAD YAMEEN v. DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER SCHOOLS AND LITERACY, D.I. KHAN 2014 YLR 381
• MAQBOOL AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 PLC(CS) 382
• ADALAT KHAN v. GUL NAZIR 2014 MLD 390
• GANDAPUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 YLR 399
• GANDAPUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 CLD 400
• Mst. ZUBAIDA BEGUM v. Haji DIN MUHAMMAD 2014 CLC 402

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes