Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAMEEN versus DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER SCHOOLS AND LITERACY, D.I. KHAN

Section Limitation Delay Deletion Rule At the time of the ban on the dismissal of the appeals, the applicant did not attach any document stating that he was either ill or was hospitalized for medical treatment. Has been done. In filing an appeal, the litigant will have to explain the delay for each, which the applicant did not specify, for the waiver of the delay in filing the review request was dismissed.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• BARKAT ALI v. PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE, PTCL, ISLAMABAD 2014 PLC(CS) 352
• SIYAR MUHAMMAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 354
• Syed IQBAL HUSSAIN SHAH v. Mst. KALSOOM BIBI 2014 YLR 359
• QISMATULLAH v. State 2014 YLR 372
• MAQBOOL AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 PLC(CS) 382
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. LUCKY CEMENT LTD. 2014 PTD 383
• ADALAT KHAN v. GUL NAZIR 2014 MLD 390
• GANDAPUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 YLR 399

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

top civil advocates from Naukundi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes