Find a Lawyer

BARKAT ALI versus PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE, PTCL, ISLAMABAD

Article 199 Constitution Petition Annual Additions, Terms and Conditions of Service Applicant Claims Annual Additions After His Retirement Applicant was of the view that departmental officials had withheld annual increases without cause and so on The other persons were also given the terms and conditions of the applicant's services, they were entitled to the minimum basic salary with allowance allowable under the usual terms but attached a condition to their appointment order. It was stated that the applicant would not be entitled to an annual increase until his / her regular term. Applicant did not qualify the prescribed department test until receiving voluntary separation scheme as a calculator on qualifying departmental accounts examination, which was required to receive annual increments according to the terms and conditions of service included in the appointment order. ? Applicant's constitutional request for claiming a required annual increase in the way is dismissed \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• ISHAN UL HAQ v. BAHRAMAND KHAN 2014 MLD 335
• NUMAN v. RAJA KHAN 2014 PCrLJ 346
• KHALID MUSHARAF HUSSAIN ZUBAIRI v. State 2014 YLR 350
• FARID KHAN v. SAEEDA BIBI 2014 MLD 351
• SIYAR MUHAMMAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 354
• Syed IQBAL HUSSAIN SHAH v. Mst. KALSOOM BIBI 2014 YLR 359
• QISMATULLAH v. State 2014 YLR 372
• MUHAMMAD YAMEEN v. DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER SCHOOLS AND LITERACY, D.I. KHAN 2014 YLR 381

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

solicitors from Timergara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes