Sections 13, 31 and 32 were filed prior to the performance of the threshold plaintiff, in which the defendant applied for dismissal on the basis of which the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Impression Act 1987 Was restricted to the validity sections 31 and 32. Independent of each other, non-compliance with Section 32 of the Act, by the Registration Officer, shall not extend the time limit in the various clauses provided in the aforesaid provisions, provided for section 32 (1) of the KP Pre-Empty Act 1987 The language must be used in the context of the expression, but in reality it was for lack of a directory penalty clause where the failure to comply with the provisions was not mentioned, the provisions were a directory. Where, however, the result was mentioned, it was necessary to override the provisions of section 31 of the Act, which is a directory of the Section 32 directory. Cannot Slim, which was essentially the plaintiff applicant filed on the basis of a registered cell deed dated 9-7 2010 and pursuant to section 31 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Emission Act 1987, this case from the date of registration of the cell deed Must be filed within 120 days but the case was filed. 30 11 2010, which was beyond the 120-day limit and it was useless to proceed. The suit was not binding at the time of the stay and both orders of the lower courts were in accordance with the law which was revised. Lemon
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
