Clause 60 and 61 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the scope of the suit limitation for possession by section 148 exemption, was the view of the plaintiffs that they had mortgaged the property in favor of the defendants but did not make the redemption effective in the asset record. And the suit was simultaneously validated. Permanent mortgage of suit property existed in favor of the defendants There was no suit property exemption available in the tax records for the defendants. The suit land was in possession of the accused as a mortgage from 1870 till now. I didn't have documentary evidence. The mortgage for the defendants or the mortgage of the suit property in favor of them, the mortgage of the disputed land was taken from the institutional suit 40 years ago. The defendants had long received revenue in favor of the Limitation Act of 1908. Under Article 148, the current suit filed for mortgage recovery suit for more than 100 years after the 60-year period was amended by any court finding any illegal, material misconduct, misrepresentation or proof Seek an order for the possession of the plaintiffs' suit under any unlawful, material irregularity, misreading or non-reading of evidence. Was banned them. Dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
