Section 417 (2A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Articles 324, 148 and 149 of the attempt to commit murder, misrepresentation, the statement of the complainant and the prosecution's witness against the failure of common evidence, relating to each other's injuries. Is negative. With the help of both appellants, there was only one, which was considered simple. And the FIR was lodged with significant delays on the unimportant part of the body; the statements of the appellants were materially improved, the presence of the accused, missing, while another person was present in the site plan. Was shown in which provocative shootings were mentioned. The FIR, however, found no crime free on the spot where no blood was found at the spot where the injured were reported, the prosecution's case was full of suspicion, and because of not being trustworthy, To this the standards were not sufficient to evaluate the evidence in the appeal. Regardless of the sentence presented to the appellant for appeals about the conviction, he was bad from the person, should not be appealed against the acquittal when an accused was acquitted, The dual concept of innocence was achieved through the And the appellate court will not interfere in it, unless the trial court's failure to prove the dismissal decision, arbitrary, fraudulent and against the record, beyond the reasonable shadow of the suspect, fails to prove the accused. No interference in the decision was requested and the appeal was not meritorious, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
