Section 52 and Q 52 Law Evidence (of the 1984 of of), Article ??7 Special Relief Act (of 1877), for the possession of Section 9 suit where the court may decide the case based on the evidence contained by the parties Unable to determine, there would be (in principle) no document of mutant title through evidence, although the assumption of fact was linked to the mutation theory long ago, but it could be rejected by effective and reliable evidence that The mutation was immediately challenged in favor of the plaintiff. The price cannot be linked to this, in which the defendants rejected this speculation by two witnesses, proving the proven Dover actions, and its author to prove the truth of the original transaction. The comparison was to take advantage of the deviation that the plaintiff failed to substantiate, and to ensure the transparency of the transfer of section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, and to avoid fraud by car. The Revenue Officer presented by the plaintiff was not appointed in the State where the house was located in the dispute, confirming the change in the public meeting, in the event that the goods obtained under section 4242, West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 Was missing, the edit was deleted.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
