The plaintiffs of Section & 42 and Su 54 of the Declaration and Permanent Order of Defendant's Land have claimed that they are the owners of the suit land in accordance with the scope of the surcharge and the decree passed by the authorities declaring the land as dedicated land. Was deleted by The trial court and the appellate court, respectively, declared the property of the suit to be devoted to the mosque with legitimate possession of the foregoing in the interest of the plaintiff, and all the plaintiffs were subsequently granted the privilege of concession. The right to take possession was in return. By the plaintiffs, the trial court did not justify them by reasonable judgment and decree that the property of the suit which was retained was in the possession of the mosque and whoever the imam of the mosque was for the services related to Imamat In return I would enjoy using it and was nominated in due course. Both the ARZ courts below considered the facts and the law applicable to which the High Court refused to apply, seeking any exception to the decisions of the courts below, as they were not arbitrary, favorable or grossly ridiculous reviews. Was rejected \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
