Article Q 42 Law of Martyrdom (1984 1984 of the), Article Su 79 Suits Statutory Execution Document, Proof of Plaintiff's Scope Containment, An Exposed Uneducated Female, was that she was the owner of the suit property and the defendant. The transfer process in favor of Ali was fake, fake and based on the same fraud. The plaintiff claimed that the suit was a substantial purchaser of the land, the suit was dismissed by the trial court, but the appellate court also ruled that the surviving transfer witnesses were not presented in the testimony box and There was no reason to suppress such evidence that the plaintiff was illiterate, and the burden of proving the "arrogant" woman and the document was that the woman had the benefit of a document affecting her right or interest in the real estate. The defendant was obliged to substantially establish this document. Understood by the woman and as a result it was a free and intelligent act which should be read to a woman who was illiterate, in her native language so that she could understand the above. The document stated that the defendant had failed to prove his case and that he was not in a better position to move the case further The plaintiff had also failed to prove that the consideration received by the plaintiff was transferred. Was required to present a minor witness as well as in whose presence the appellate court presented The reason why the compensation was paid was that no legal or factual error was identified in the unidentified verdict.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
