Sections 2 (c), 26A, 26 (4) and 26 (6) of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) clause 42 and 54 of the Electric Power Act, disclose the rights of the licensors charged with the slow switching of the power meter. The trial court erred in failing to comply with the provisions of Section 26A, but dismissed the case established by the plaintiff / respondent, but preliminary appeal was allowed by the plaintiff / respondents that the view of the plaintiff / applicants. The second was reinforced that the power meter was installed. The plaintiff / respondent's crushing machine was not in his name but the same person's name, therefore, he had no prosecution and locus standi to file a case related to this matter and appealed the case. The court had to find out. The decision by the electric inspector was against the law, as the plaintiffs / defendants themselves refer to the civil court. The defendant / defendants owned and operated the machine, therefore, had no power in any way under Section 2 (c) of the Defendants / Applicants \ Electricity Act, 1910. Who was the owner or occupier of the premises, which was temporarily linked to the licensing works for energy supply purposes, therefore, the plaintiff / defendant was a \ user and the cause was And Lux Standi was not at liberty to bring a case under section 24 (4) of the Electricity Act, 1910, when there was a dispute regarding the accuracy of the meter bill and as long as the provision of section 26 (6) of the Electricity Act It is not licensed to remove the meter unless determined otherwise. , 1910 Defendants / Applicants resort to the power meter pursuant to section 26 (6) of the Act.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
