Find a Lawyer

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER versus BACHA ZARIN

Section 18 Court Reference Increase in Compensation The referee judge increased the amount of compensation from Rs 823 per marla to 15,000 mandatory acquisition compensation, as well as the Validity Referee Court appointed a local commission to inspect the area in the presence of the parties. According to the local commission submitted its report. The referee court relied on the report of the local commission per diem which was not objected to by the plaintiff government, which is sufficient to calculate the compensation rate by the local commission and merely the decision of the referee court. Was reasonable and reasonable. In the circumstances the appeal was dismissed

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. HAZRAT NABI 2014 YLR 2341
• AZIZ-UR-REHMAN v. DIN BIBI 2014 YLR 2367
• Mst. ZUBAIDA v. Mst. HUSSAIN BIBI 2014 YLR 2379
• SAID QAMASH v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 YLR 2400
• Mst. ZEENAT-UN-NISA v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 2014 YLR 2460
• Mst. SALMA BIBI v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2014 YLR 2481
• GENERAL MANAGER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY v. FAZAL MUHAMMAD 2014 YLR 2502
• Mst. HAMEEDA BIBI v. INAYAT ULLAH 2014 YLR 2520

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

us immigration advocates from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes