AZAD KHAN versus THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SATELLITE TOWN QUETTA
Sections 154, 182 and 190 for the registration of the second FIR were not imposed in connection with the second version of the FIR in respect of the different versions given by the affected party. Was that the second FIR should not contain facts. Simply enriching the first version, the only alternative available to the applicant for filing a second FIR is that the filing of a private complaint was without any material law, even though he had filed a private complaint with the magistrate in the motion. Can come. Section 9090, CCPC, but there may be cases where evidence cannot be collected to prove the commission of a crime, except for the availability of alternative treatment by the police agency, and Section H for their official duties. Will delete from the program. Section 154, considered under the CRPC, does not prevent the police from instructing the police to file a second FIR in the APP. Support the case that leads to the registration of the second FIR In case of giving, the matter will never end. And there would be chains and repetition of the FI rupees, it was dismissed, because after section 182, the CCP had submitted a complete response to the dispute, if anyone had reported the first information to the police officer, who would later be wrong. As it turned out, the informant could be liable to be punished under the provisions of section 182; the persons belonging to CRPC Section H were instructed to apply strictly in accordance with the law against the accused. Enter the KFIR
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
