MS. ZAHIDA NAWAZ versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT
Arts 199 and 25 Constitutional Application Civil Service Appointment Letter, Impact of Issuance of Admission to the Distinguished Post on Merit in Appointment The petition lady applied for the post of Research Officer (BS17) in the relevant department and took the required test and filed an interview. The candidate was declared successful and an offer letter was issued for the post under which he accepted and approved his medical examination. No letter of appointment was issued to the applicant as the inquiry post was allotted to a zone / city, which was different from the city. Where the applicant was removed from the position, there were eight different seats available for the post under question, six of which were allocated to different cities / zones, and the remaining two seats were based on merit, both on merit. One of the incumbent seats was allocated to the candidate. Those who obtained lower marks than the petitioner had the required qualifications and successfully passed the exam and got the exams and highest score, therefore, in one of their two merit based seats. The appointment was not understandable but the effect of the department was that due to the zonal quota the applicant could not be appointed as the applicant was seeking it. The appointment of a merit-based seat, and not reserved for the zonal quota, constitutes discrimination in the absence of the applicant's position as she was eligible for that position, but the applicant's non-appointment also depends on gender. Discrimination can be classified on the basis of. The constitution was specifically allowed to apply for a constitution and was granted
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
