Find a Lawyer

MUSAWIR AHMED versus GHULAM RASOOL

Scope Landlord applied for an eviction petition against the appellant / tenant for failure to comply with the timely submission of rent to Section 13 and 15 tenants. The controller instructed the tenant / appellant to submit the monthly rent to the appellant. The tenant failed to collect the rent by complying with the rent controller's order, resulting in the discrimination dismissal order. The order was invalid The civil Nazir's review report showed that the appellant / tenant had not deposited the rent in compliance with the rent controller's order and in case of delay the appellant / tenant was permanently delayed by the appellant / tenant. Failure to present a reasonable explanation for the offer, must be specified and every day in submitting rent It was not advisable to justify the delay and deposit the outstanding rent in only one case, in accordance with the law passed by the Controller of Rental to prevent the tenant from being deprived. App r \ n

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014

• MUHAMMAD AYUB v. State 2014 PCrLJ 178
• Dr. ABDUL RASHEED v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2014 PLD 186
• ATTAULLAH v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, LOCAL GOVERNMENT RURAL DEVELOPMEN AND AGROVILLES DEPARTMENT 2014 PLD 206
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY S&GAD, HOUSING ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE, QUETTA 2014 PLC(CS) 219
• ABDUL KARIM v. The S.H.O. SARIAB POLICE STATION QUETTA 2014 PCrLJ 240
• ANWAR SHAH v. SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, QUETTA 2014 PLC(CS) 250
• AZAD KHAN v. The STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SATELLITE TOWN QUETTA 2014 PCrLJ 256
• ALI JAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 267

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2014 →

female advocates from Hasilpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes