ANWAR SHAH versus SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, QUETTA
Article 199 Constitution Petition Appointment of the Right to Appointment of Civil Service Appointment and Serial No. 1 of the Interview and Merit List, which was officially approved by the appointing authority without any legal justification for the applicants' appointment orders. Was kept The appointment authority said that under an agreement, the posts posted were specified. The victims of the dam construction, who surrendered their houses and lands for the construction of the dam, were summoned from the district candidates for legitimate posts for posts where applicants belonging to the applicants were born in the district mentioned above. Posts were not mentioned in any case related to the fact that only victims of the dam could apply for positions No objection was raised at the time of their test or interview regarding the applicant's accommodation. Advertise the posts as a question between the administration and the dam victims The contract was signed before. Applicants were accepted by the appointing authority when they were selected by the selection committee, therefore, the matter became a past and closed chapter for all intents and purposes, followed by the issuance of applicant appointment orders. Somersault was a position made by denying authority appointments. The express act of destabilization by the appointing authority was formulated in favor of the applicants, which in the present case cannot be taken in the manner prescribed by the appointing authority, in which to prevent the applicant's appointment orders, Recovery of Furnaces
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
