Section 9 (c) successfully established the definition of evidence related to drug possession and trafficking, the recovery of marijuana and opium banned from the possession of the accused, whose presence at the site of the incident was not denied. Witnesses specifically stated that the anti-narcotics force commander received sources information about the presence of the narcotic with the accused for transportation abroad, evidence of the prosecution was not verified or denied successfully. Evidence presented by the defendants in their defense also stated their involvement in the commission of the alleged crime. ? Neither denied his presence nor justified his presence at this place, while records have shown that none of them were permanently located, the prosecution said in the prosecution's evidence. The unwanted verdict rendered was found to be illegal, illegal, misrepresenting and not reading any evidence. Not only the convenience but also the credible and trustworthy evidence was not in the evidence that the accused or the accused involved in the alleged crime convicted under Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act 1997 under the trial court Could show any ulterior motive or design for involvement or involvement, was retained and appeal was excluded, to the extent
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
