Section 412 Receiving stolen property fraudulently Defining evidence Benefits of doubt No evidence was presented by the prosecution that the defendant knew the stolen vehicle was stolen in the robbery commission, which was a necessary component of section 412, The PPC prosecution itself recorded some documents that the prosecution in question with the Excise and Taxation Officer denied the self-certifying vehicle claim, and obtained the defendant's certificate confirming that he was a clear buyer of the vehicle, according to the prosecution. Evidence shows, as well as the accused. Although he did not establish ownership of the vehicle, evidence showed reasonable suspicion in the prosecution's case, which prevented it. The benefit of which should be extended to the accused document, which was informed in the Computerized Screen Record of the Excise and Taxation Office about not registering the vehicle in question, cannot be taken into account, as the accused was told Was not given Its inspection under section 342 failed to prove its case against the CCPC prosecution accused beyond reasonable doubt. And the anonymous verdict reflects misreading and not reading the evidence, which could not have been sustained in those circumstances. The judgment passed by the trial court was set aside. The accused was acquitted of the charge, and was out on bail because of his bail.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
