MUHAMMAD HANIF versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION NEW SARIAB, QUETTA
Section 154 FIR Cross Version Option and Section H Option and Duties When two clear and contrary versions came on the record, the commission of the crime was not only different from each other, but at some points all proportional to each other. In the interest of justice, the fair inquiry also demanded that a separate FIR be filed and interrogated on the basis of the informant's request, so that both copies be presented to the court. This time it will be in a position to determine, and decide which version is fully or partially teaching. That was it. Only the FIR filed immediately, and with the full details of both versions, the trial court was required to put both versions in the juxtaposition, and after assessing credibility, and evaluating the crime, the court Can determine the question of aggression. And then the guilt or innocence of the accused will be practically impossible, because in the case of two different versions, one may be in the form of an FIR, because of the importance, such as the definition of evidence, careful and careful not to do so. Can be done as ifting if separated. If the anti-graft counter to graft was limited to a mere defense version, another FIR could not be registered, but if a separate and separately identifiable offense was disclosed, and an effective investigation or trial was conducted properly. Cannot be appreciated and considered. Both versions, followed by another FIR to file a section HO, had in the present case refused to file a lawsuit illegally. He was instructed by the High Court that he
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
