The testimony of Section 302 (b) Qatil-e-Amad evidence came at 3:00 pm on the day it was alleged that he was the sole culprit of double murder, the prosecution's witnesses, the legal heirs of the two victims. , Who took over. Because of the slight improvement in his statement of the prosecution witness, there was no enmity, illicit desire or an ultra design to get the accused involved in the case, contradicting his statement from the recovery memo, the witness mentioned at the material point The statement was the same, there was no contradiction or contradiction; the prosecution's witness had long been under scrutiny, but his statement did not remove any particular contradiction or contradiction, which led to the factual position of the case. Doubts may be raised, the witness's statement was supported or corroborated by the statements of the complainant and other prosecutor's witness The medical report was also a confirmation of the complainant's statement, and its support was also supported by the witness's recovery of the investigative version TT Pistol, there was nothing available that could substantiate the evidence of the prosecutor's testimony. , The investigating officer fully confirmed the prosecution's version of sending the vacant for analysis for two months, there is no point in denying when the commission of the murder investigation by the accused in the light of day The question of the delay was not shown, so he showed that he could hide his identity or his address and kill him. Any hesitation or fear, identity, therefore, can not be doubted accused trial court had properly deal with the evidence and the accused that they had reached a correct conclusion
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
