The witness's statement in view of the value of the evidence in section 2 302 (b), which was the last time the accused and the victim were seen, recorded the defendant's recorded confession before the Judicial Magistrate before recovering the empty shell of the pistol used in the commission. The statement was supported. The crime reinforced the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses, the defendant's confessional statement was voluntarily recorded without any rigor, nothing was on record to show that the confessional offense posed any threat, repression or pressure. Because the Judicial Magistrate had followed all the traditions necessary for recording the confessional statement, which was voluntary and true. There was no legal restriction to record the conviction, which was later overturned, if they were voluntary and genuine witnesses of the prosecution, and they would confirm each other. His statements were fully supported by the immediate registration of the FIR, the recovery memo, and the confessional statement of the accused witnesses, but he remained steadfast, and he was not sent to trial court after proper examination of the evidence. And the material available on the record, reached a correct and correct conclusion, in the absence of any unlawful proceedings or irregularities, in an unknown decision, its appeal cannot be interfered with.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
