INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES AND PRACTICES, QUETTA versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, SECRETARY LAND UTILIZATION/SENIOR MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, QUETTA
Section 24 (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 10A, 24 (1), 24 (2) and 1991 Constitutional application to re-open the land leased to the institute providing valuable skills to unknown persons Starting work Notice and assignment reasons Legislative hearing The jurisdiction of the trial hearing was granted by the scope trustees of the trust to the provincial government for the allotment of the land, acting in favor of the institute to make a lease deed. Four years after the aforementioned lease was canceled, the authorities canceled the lease and resumed the land in favor of state legal status. The entire amount of the lease was paid to the Rakari Institute, for this purpose the land was not utilized substantially and no notice was issued for any reason which may have been due to it. The government is required to re-work it from the ground up nor was the Provincial Government of the Institute given the opportunity to be heard, so clearly implemented under Articles 24 (1) and 24 (2) of the Constitution. The basic rights (protection of property rights) were also violated The institute was serving the people and providing valuable skills to a deprived sector, including teaching and displaying models. Such expertise as is taught by the Institute for Sustainable Living, Water Storage, Biogas Generation, Electricity, and the Use of the Sun and Energy, is expected from international conventions and the latest scientific evidence. The activities of the institute should be supported but instead instituted under the auspices of the provincial government, illegally, illegally and unconstitutionally.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2014
