Sections 12, 42, and 54 for the specific performance of the contract, the declaration, the injunction and the restitution of the suit, the plaintiff filed an affidavit in the evidence of his claim, but he was not present in court for his own cross-examination. Neither the wind nor the defendant examined, although there were numerous opportunities provided that the defendant made his statement with evidence in his affidavit, in which case, the court did not consider the defendant's failure to appear. can go. The absence of a positive statement in support of the plaintiff and the absence of a general witness examination of the defense witness will give rise to a negative view of the plaintiff. These were such good factors that it can be safely assumed that the agreement was not executed in favor of the plaintiff because the defendant had clearly made that decision. It was denied execution and the evidence unconsciously and irrevocably Ounce initially banned the plaintiff to prove the execution of the contract, and for this ended all satisfactory methods of execution. Because there was a clear dispute over the implementation of the agreement and doubts. The originality and the plaintiff must dispose of all doubts, all serious witnesses and author of the motion, if he discharges this responsibility, he will move to the defendant, To prove otherwise, the claimant for the plaintiff failed to discharge his obligation to come to court for cross-examination and also to examine the defendant, since the plaintiff's own evidence substantiated the execution of the contract. No, this will give rise to negative thinking against the plaintiff and that
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
