Section 9 (c) Police Rules, 1934, RR 25 3 and 25 4 were not presented to the police station, which was allegedly 5/6 km away from the recovery and brought the accused to the CIA Center. After a 25km journey, which showed that the accused had not been presented to the prohibited police station on any occasion, nor had the investigation been assigned to a police officer at a relevant police station. Which was a clear violation of the Supreme Court order. Court arrest and investigation As a clear violation of the Supreme Court order made by the complainant / police officer, it cannot be legalized as CIA officials have also been involved in CRPC and Chapter 166 (1). ) And (4) of the Act. XXI, Rr 25 3 & 25 4 Police Rules 1934 Before the arrest of the accused, they should have informed the area police station, and if they were arrested, they should have been presented to the relevant Section H, CI. O had no choice. Detain the accused for up to 5 hours without registering an FIR. He should have presented it and his conviction to the area police and it was the duty of the relevant Section H to provide an inquiry into any of his subordinates. And then the CIA official could investigate after obtaining an order from a competent authority, in which the investigation conducted by the CIA official was illegal, invalid and without legal authority, the unclean decision was not sustainable in law. ? One side and the accused were acquitted
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
